3D Geek V 3D Consumer

Early 3D technology made it possible for manufacturers such as Samsung, Sony and Panasonic to introduce 3D TV sets into the homes of tech hungry homeowners around the world. They did what all technology manufacturers do and applied the early-adopter rule of 'money being no object and technical specification being everything.' So they all when ahead and developed the geektastic active 3D technology systems that require shutter glasses with powered lenses and transmitter mechanisms to sync the tech-heavy 3D glasses to the display unit.


Subsequntly, other world-class TV manufacturers such as LG, Philips, Toshiba, Vizio, Cello, Manta, Bush and Finlux began to develop 3D TV systems aimed at mainstream consumers. Having seen the pros and cons of early 3D units, they opted to use passive 3D systems technology paired with relatively inexpensive passive 3D glasses. Making passive 3D glasses is no more complicated than making a pair of standard sunglasses. Only the specially designed polarized lenses are different. That's when the active v passive debate/war kicked into overdrive with the result that Sony and Panasonic only recently and arguably reluctantly joining the massed ranks of passive 3D TV makers.


The fact is, however, the real difference lies not in whether active 3D glasses are too heavy/cause dizziness and headaches, or passive 3D glasses offer a less immersive cheap as chips experience: the real difference lies in the eye and the mind of the beholder.

Each of us experiences 3D in a way that is unique to our own viewing physiology. Our eyes, our experiences and our preferences, shape the way we see things. The fact is, we simply do not see exactly the same things as people sitting right next to us. Moreover, 3D is a depth-perception illusion created in our mind’s unique eye. While technical facts and research can advance all manner of claims, it is only you who can decide what rocks your 3D world... This is an extract. To read the full article visit the news page at www.oskav.com